[[{“value”:”
George W McMillan III, RavenGeostrategic.com, Copyright © June 23, 2024
The Seven P Plan of the Left Series of Papers—Defining the Problem Set
The Purpose of the Seven P Plan of the Left series of papers is to explain how the Left has abandoned “objective measures and standards” (Allan Bloom, The Closing of the American Mind, 1988) and “abandoned the scientific project” (Barkow, Tooby and Cosmides, The Adapted Mind, 1992) in the philosophical and social sciences and the social sciences by the late 1980s.
The result is that the philosophical and social sciences in the University system have become a jumbled mess of incoherent “arguments” tearing down an evolutionary, political, and economically stable society as opposed to a logical system of micro-psychological and macro-political, sociological, economic, and geopolitical theories that a stable and enduring society is based on.
It is ultimately the abandonment of the scientific project in the University system that is leading to the “strange death of Europe” as described by Douglas Murray or “the fate of empires” in terms of John Glubb.
Avoiding the Performance of Autopsies on Failed Marxist Experiments
The primary reason for the “abandonment of the scientific project” in the Western University system is that the Left has avoided performing autopsies on failed Marxist experiments to further their transformation of America and the West toward a socialist utopia based on total equality as opposed to merit and functional productivity.
The performance of autopsies on the dysfunctionality of the failed Marxist bureaucratic experiments is antithetical to their goal of transforming America and the West into their idyllic vision of a globalist socialist utopia run by central bureaucracies. The Left abandoned the systematic investigation of constructive versus destructive human behavioral patterns of the failed Marxist experiments to preserve their utopian vision and is destroying the West.
This series of papers advances the thesis of Tooby and Cosmides in “The Psychological Foundations of Culture” (in Barkow, Tooby and Cosmides 1992) that the revitalization of the scientific project was required to restore systematic investigation and objectivity in the Western University system.
The goal is to develop a logically coherent explanation of micro and macro human behavioral theories expressed as an “integrated causal model.” An Integrated Causal Model consisting of interdisciplinary frameworks linked in series is easily obtainable since every discipline had already developed overarching frameworks of analysis by the 1970s.
These overarching frameworks incorporate all of the subfield theories inside their respective discipline and can be merged laterally because they share a similar constructive versus destructive dichotomy format. When arranged in an “individual psychology to a family and small group social psychology segment” that is conjoined with a “large group political, economic, and global geopolitical segment,” the arrangement lends itself to a singular Cartesian-style system.
This system is expressed in the Unified Behavioral Theory of the Philosophical and Social Sciences and represents an integrated causal model of the social sciences to meet the requirements of Tooby and Cosmides (1992) in evolutionary and Nobel Laureate John Harsanyi in interdisciplinary economics and game theory. (See John Harsanyi, “Explanation and Comparative Dynamics in Social Science,” Behavioral Science, 1960: and “A Bargaining Model for Social Status in Informal Groups and Formal Organizations,” Behavioral Science, 1966)
Leo Strauss and the Destructive Germ of Marxism
Lastly, it is important to understand that reversing the self-destructive “Seven P Plan of the Left” on both sides of the Atlantic begins with the reformation of the University system as the basis of reforming the rest of the societal institutions. The decline of the West needs to be reversed. A simple reorganization of the University curriculum could facilitate this process.
The logically coherent system of social scientific theories can be readily achieved by organizing the academic staff. Since the overarching constructive-destructive frameworks already exist in the areas of evolutionary, psychological, political, economic, and geopolitical theory, all that needs to be done is to (a) point out what the constructive-destructive behavioral frameworks are and (b) explain how they link laterally into a coherent system. The benefit is that this system illustrates a design in nature and, therefore, a designer of nature.
The objective of Marxism is to obfuscate the design of nature as the means of obfuscating the designer of nature since it is an atheistic ideology. Hence, the Left avoids the performance of autopsies on failed Marxist experiments and simultaneously abandons the scientific project. These two academic trends need to be reversed if the conservative Universities slightly reorganize their curriculum to maximize its effectiveness.
The destructive Seven P Plan of the Left is described in this series of papers and explains how the Trump administration can initiate the revitalization of the University system in the conservative Universities and the Austrian Schools of economic thought in conjunction with the interdisciplinary economic sciences and game theoretic communities. In this sense, the “Seven P Plan of the Left” series of short papers explains the “problem set”, whereas the Unified Behavioral Theory/Integrated Causal Model represents the “solution set.”
An Integrated Causal Model as a Simplification of the Social Sciences
The Unified Behavioral Theory/Integrated Causal Model of the Social Sciences is way simpler than it sounds at first blush. The frameworks are presented in six books. Barwkow Tooby and Cosmides, The Adapted Mind, (1992), Erich Fromm’s The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness (1973), Seymour Lipset’s article “Some Social Requisites for Democracy” (1959), Aristotle’s Politics that explains the Six Forms of Government, and general microeconomic and macroeconomic texts.
The core of the model is based on the government Form theories of Plato in The Republic and Aristotle’s Six Forms of Government presented in Politics. Aristotle’s Six Forms of Government framework is controlling because it has the Proper and Perverted Forms of Government that merge with the functional-dysfunctional and constructive-destructive behavioral dichotomies in psychological personality theory and the virtuous-vicious functional-dysfunctional economic theory. Aristotle’s Six Forms of Government is the behavioral framework that integrates the entire range of the philosophical and social sciences.
Furthermore, if one performs autopsies on failed Marxist experiments in political and economic history classes in conjunction with teaching Plato and Aristotle and basic economics courses, then one can see how Marxist bureaucratic systems are always dysfunctional for a multiplicity of reasons.
One would think that any University could teach the relationship of classical Greek Government form theories, Lipset’s “Some Social Requisites for Democracy” which provides the relationship of Aristotle’s Six Forms of Government to Economic Gwoth/Demographic rates of change proportions to First and Second World more developed country outcomes and Third and Fourth Word less developed country outcomes.
The Need For an Interdisciplinary Fusion Cell in the University System
It is Lipset’s macro-political, economic, and geopolitical sequence segment that provides the basis for establishing logical coherence in the philosophical and social sciences. It begs the question “So why don’t they? The answer is that the Philosophical and Social Sciences lack a functional information fusion cell like multinational corporations and functional military have.
The Discipline of Physics has performed the fusion cell role in the physical sciences but the discipline of Philosophy was taken over by the Frankfort School neo-Marxists and abandoned objective measures and standards and comparative ideological systems analysis—the two elements of the scientific method—the comparison of competing hypotheses and measurement systems. For this reason, the discipline of Philosophy can no longer perform the fusion cell function.
The Unified Theory of the Philosophical and Social Sciences/Integrated Causal Model is more of a simplification model at its core that follows the guidelines of complexity theory, but its main function is that it is the guidelines for a functional fusion center for the philosophical and social sciences.
Tooby and Cosmides’ argument in “The Psychological Foundations of Culture” is correct, the social sciences are taught haphazardly. Their expertise was in Evolutionary Biology so they didn’t know how to fix the philosophical and social sciences but their criticism was correct. The Unified Behavioral Theory/Integrated Causal Model lines up the micro and macro behavioral social sciences in a consistent functional-dysfunctional and constructive-destructive behavioral dynamic model to arrive at a solution.
The Unified Behavioral Theory/Integrated Causal Model of the Philosophical and Social Sciences is expressed in separate papers and slide sets. Please read the “Seven P Plan of the Left” series of papers to better understand why the Left is panicking because they mistakenly believe that leading the West to economic ruin is the pathway to their Globalist Statist utopia. This understanding sheds light on why the current political climate is the best time to begin reversing the destructive tendencies in North America and Europe.
Ideology and Differing Family and Government Forms
The “Seven P Plan” describes the seven key governmental and social institutions required to (a) transform the West from a Christian Capitalist Republic based on the Patriarchal nuclear family concept to (b) an Atheistic Socialist single-party welfare state that exalts the idea of matriarchal and alternative conceptions of the family following Jean Jacques Rousseau’s Discourse on the Origin of Inequality Among Men (1755) and Friedrich Engels’ The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State (1884).
The Seven P Plan
(1) The “Professor P” refers to the replacement of the traditional Western university curricula based on the evolution of Judeo-Christianity in conjunction with Ancient Greek Political Philosophy with post-Rousseauian Leftist literature. Leftist literature exalts both Atheism and the welfare state to better support matriarchal families. Following the ideas of Marcuse, Leftists have systematically excluded all competing hypotheses of human behavior in the university curricula.
(2) The “Prosecutor P” refers to the practice of replacing all free-market curricula in the pre-law and law school programs as the means of placing Left-leaning attorneys in all prosecutorial and judicial positions to override any legal objections to transforming America into a welfare state.
(3) The “Police P” refers to the replacement of traditional training curricula with Leftist curricula in all police, military, and intelligence community “gun carrying” positions at all federal, state, and local levels. The Left wants full control of the enforcement arm of the government to subdue any resistance.
(4) The “Politician P” refers to the replacement of all Western classical curricula with Leftist literature as the means of generating more Left-leaning politicians at all federal, state, and local levels to expand the Great Society welfare state programs.
(5) The “Press P” refers to the practice of replacing traditional curricula in the university schools of journalism to promote feminism and Leftism in all mass communications markets. The media typically performs character assassination of anyone who opposes them.
(6) The “Priest P” refers to the reshaping of the curricula of as many theological schools as possible to promote feminist matriarchal family structure values and displace the traditional Abrahamic Patriarchal conceptions of the family by presenting father-headed households as “outdated.”
(7) The “Parental P” refers to the goal of the Rousseau-Marx-Engels thought lineage to replace the Abrahamic Patriarchal system with a single-parent matriarchal family that rests on mass redistributive programs expressed in the history of feminist literature.
Experts or Charlatans?
The chart on the next page explains why all “experts” are “Democrats” while the Unified Behavioral Theory/Integrated Causal Model of the Philosophical and Social Science series of papers and slide sets explains why they are charlatans.
In closing, the reversal of the “Seven P Plan of the Left” begins with using Seymoure Lipset’s ”Some Social Requisites for Democracy” article as a guide to correlate macro behavioral Government Form Frameworks, economic/demographic rates of change proportions, to Geopolitical More Developed-Less Developed Country spectrum to add logical coherency to the macro philosophical and social sciences. In this respect, one can rule out the Rousseau, Marx, and Engles’ series of Foundational, Political, Economic, and Geopolitical frameworks, and then build the behavioral theory around Adam Smith’s series of Foundational, Political, Economic, and Geopolitical (See Kant, Perpetual Peace) theories to parallel the Government From, Economic growth theories/population Growth and Geopolitical Form measurement frameworks.
For everything written by George McMillan for Energy News Beat, check out his landing page here: https://energynewsbeat.co/george-mcmillian/
The post The Seven P Plan of the Left Part 1: The Transformation of America into a Single-Party Socialist State appeared first on Energy News Beat.
“}]]
Energy News Beat